CJA Vol.33 Issue 3
Guest Editorial: Silence Is Not Golden: It’s Consent - p81
Keith H. Charlton
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Presenting as Low Back
Pain: A Case Report - p83
Colin M. Crawford
Demographics and Diagnostic Profile of Patients
Presenting to a University Chiropractic Outpatient Clinic -
p89
Sandy Bryant, Brett W. Atkins and Peter W. Bull
The Effect of Cervical Spine Manipulation on Motor
Control in Healthy Individuals: A Pilot Study - 93
Brian A. Enebo
The Palmer School of Chiropractic: Development of
the Faculty 1906-1945 - 98
Rolf E. Peters and Mary Ann Chance
Chiropractor Receives Centennial Medal of Australia - p98
In Memoriam: Fred H. Barge - p117
Letters to the Editors - p118
ABSTRACTS
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Presenting as Low
Back Pain: A Case Report
COLIN M. CRAWFORD
Objective: To report the case of a 73-year-old male with low back
pain presenting to a chiropractic teaching clinic in whom an abdominal
aortic aneurysm (AAA) was fortuitously found on plain film radiography.
Clinical Features: The patient presented with a 3-week history of sudden
onset low back pain of minimal-to-moderate severity, which he attributed
to walking. The physical examination findings, including an unremarkable
abdominal examination, suggested a diagnosis of acute mechanical low
back pain. Plain film radiographs demonstrated an AAA measuring 8.5 cm
in transverse diameter. In a retrospective file review, clinical risk
factors for AAA were present. Intervention and Outcome: The patient was
referred to his general medical practitioner and subsequently to a
vascular surgeon. He underwent surgical repair with Dacron graft
prosthesis. His back pain resolved the day after surgery. Conclusion:
AAA may present as low back pain, and thus it is important to actively
exclude the condition in ‘at risk’ patients. Risk factors include male
patients 65 years and older presenting with abdominal and/or low back
pain, a significant smoking history, increased weight, cardiovascular
disease, vascular claudication, chronic obstructive airway disease, and
a first degree relative with AAA. Patients at risk need urgent referral
for appropriate imaging and/or vascular surgical opinion.
INDEX TERMS: ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM; LOW BACK PAIN;
CHIROPRACTIC.
Back to top
Demographics and Diagnostic Profile of
Patients Presenting to a University Chiropractic Outpatient
Clinic
SANDY BRYANT, BRETT W. ATKINS, and PETER W. BULL
Objective: To report the demographic and diagnostic profiles of
patients attending the Macquarie University Department of Chiropractic
Clinic and Research Centre, Summer Hill, upon initial consultation.
Design and Outcome Variables: Researchers reviewed and collected data
from 1018 new patient files covering the period 1999-2001. Data
collected consisted of age, sex, marital status, financial status,
postcode, symptomatic region and diagnosis. Results: Of the 1018 patient
files reviewed, 70% of patients were aged between 22 and 51 years of
age. Patients were predominantly from the local area with no major
gender bias detected. A total of 40% of patients had symptoms in the
lumbar region, and the most common diagnosis was facet syndrome.
Conclusion: Whilst most of the findings were similar to those in other
studies, a few differences were noted. The occurrence of disc injuries
was significantly lower than those found in the general population,
while gender and marital status also differed.
INDEX TERMS: DEMOGRAPHICS; CHIROPRACTIC; PROFILE; TEACHING;
CLINIC
Back to top
The Effect of Cervical Spine Manipulation on
Motor Control in Healthy Individuals: A Pilot Study
BRIAN ENEBO
Objective: To evaluate the effect of spinal manipulation on motor
control and feedback processes in health individuals. Design: Pilot
study. Setting and Participants: Eight participants recruited from a
private chiropractic practice and from a chiropractic college.
Intervention: Participants were assigned either to a treatment or
control group and learned a cervical spine rotation task to 3 targets:
30o (left rotation, 0o (centre) and 20o (right rotation). Treatment
participants received cervical spine manipulation between acquisition
(knowledge of results trials) and retention (no knowledge of results
trials). Control participants received cervical spine orthopaedic
procedures between acquisition and retention. Main Outcome Measures: To
evaluate whether high velocity, low amplitude cervical spine
manipulation would improve cervical spine rotation accuracy and
variability compared to a control group. Dependent measures included
absolute error, variable error and total variability. Results: There was
no significant difference between groups in acquisition. Significance
was found between groups during retention for the right (20o) and centre
(0o) targets only. Conclusions: Cervical spine joint manipulation
improved overall movement accuracy and overall movement variability but
did not improve participant individual variability.
INDEX TERMS: CHIROPRACTIC; SPINAL MANIPULATION; CERVICAL SPINE; ERROR
DETECTION; ERROR CORRECTION.
Back to top
The Palmer School of Chiropractic:
Development of the Faculty 1906-1945
Rolf E. Peters and Mary Ann Chance
As many of the chiropractors practising in Australia prior to the end
of World War II had attended the Palmer School of Chiropractic, an
attempt is made to trace the development of the Palmer Faculty during
the 40-year period of 1906-1945.
INDEX TERMS: MeSH: CHIROPRACTIC; HISTORICAL ARTICLE. Other: PALMER
SCHOOL OF CHIROPRACTIC.
Back to top
|