CJA Vol.26 Issue 4
Editorial: The Patient, the Payer, and the Policy Maker
Mary Ann Chance and Rolf E. Peters
Tools for Refining Patient-Centred Care: A
Consideration of LOC and SOC in the Chiropractic Consultation
Jennifer R. Jamison
TMJ Pain and Chiropractic Adjustment—A Pilot
Study
Anthony O’Reilly and Henry Pollard
A Mathematical Basis for Defining Vertebral
Subluxations and Their Correction
John A. Dulhunty
The Best of Books (and a Lemon) for 1996: A
Chiropractor’s Reading List
Phillip Ebrall
Scope of Practice, Research, Education and the Future
Herbert J. Vear
A Backward Glance...The Western Australian Story
Stanley P. Bolton
In Memoriam
ABSTRACTS
Tools for Refining Patient-Centred Care: A
Consideration of LOC and SOC in the Chiropractic
Consultation
JENNIFER R. JAMISON
ABSTRACT: Introduction: Chiropractors offer a patient-centred form of
clinical care. Locus of control (LOC) and sense of coherence (SOC) are
constructs which provide insight into the global orientation of an
individual. These indices could be used to provide the practitioner with
additional insight into the particular psychological management needs of
individual patients. This study described the LOC and SOC of a number of
chiropractic patients and sought to identify whether routinely gathered
clinical information deserved further investigation as a possible
screening index for formal measurement of SOC and/or LOC.
Method: Forty-nine chiropractors were asked to participate in a pilot
study and invite six of their patients to complete a closed-question
questionnaire which evaluated the patient’s SOC, LOC and perception of
their condition. Practitioners were asked to supply information about
the diagnosis, progress and management of each patient.
Results: Twenty-five chiropractors and 149 patients participated. One
hundred twenty patients were included in the final sample. No routinely
collected clinical data was identified in this study which could serve
as a screening tool to identify the desirability of undertaking formal
SOC and/or LOC assessment. The clinical profiles of 120 patients with
respect to these indices are reported.
Discussion: Consideration is given to how knowledge of SOC and LOC may
refine chiropractic practice with respect to providing
patient-orientated clinical care. Conclusions: Assessment of LOC and SOC
deserves consideration as a potential data collection tool in the
development of a sophisticated, patient-centred, chiropractic model of
health care.
INDEX TERMS: MeSH: INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; CHIROPRACTIC. OTHER:
SENSE OF COHERENCE; LOCUS OF CONTROL; PATIENT CENTRED MODEL.
Chiropr J Aust 1996; 26:118-24.
Back to top
TMJ Pain and Chiropractic Adjustment-A Pilot
Study
ANTHONY O’REILLY and HENRY POLLARD
Objective: This project investigates the relationship between spinal
adjustment and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain. Design: Controlled
pilot trial.
Setting: Private chiropractic practice. Patients: Twelve (12) patients
assessed by dentists in private practice as having TMJ syndrome,
randomly assigned to a chiropractic treatment or a placebo treatment
(remote trigger point therapy) group.
Intervention: Patients in the chiropractic group received weekly
chiropractic adjustments for six weeks to correct cervical spine
vertebral dysfunctions, and controls received weekly trigger point
therapy to cervico-thoracic muscles for six weeks.
Main Outcome Measure: McGill Pain Questionnaire administered before and
after the trial. Results: Both groups demonstrated similar changes. Due
to greater than anticipated reduction in pain in the trigger point
therapy (control) group, the results were statistically the same using a
Mann-Whitney non-parametric test (p = 0.9025), however a subjective,
graphical comparison of results suggests that spinal adjustment may have
some superiority over the trigger point method.
Conclusions: Further investigation is warranted, but future studies
should involve a larger sample, sham treatment other than
cervico-thoracic trigger point therapy, and a pain assessment tool
specifically designed for TMJ symptoms.
INDEX TERMS: MeSH: CHIROPRACTIC; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT SYNDROME;
CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROMES; PAIN MEASUREMENT. OTHER:
MANIPULATION, CHIROPRACTIC.
Chiropr J Aust 1996; 26:125-9.
Back to top
A Mathematical Basis for Defining Vertebral
Subluxations and Their Correction
JOHN A. DULHUNTY
Objective: To define the mechanical component of the "vertebral
subluxation" in terms that can be expressed as an all-encompassing
mathematical formula.
Method: A review of the literature relating to the vertebral subluxation
suggests that it is not a well defined entity and that confusion exists
over the nature of the spinal lesion it is supposed to describe. A
mathematical and mechanical basis for defining the vertebral subluxation
is presented, encompassing both static and dynamic components. This
model attempts to embrace the historical and semantic factors underlying
the concept as well as incorporating contemporary concepts such as the
vertebral subluxation complex.
Results: A formula was developed based on mechanical principles that
relates the four basic mechanical components of the subluxation, namely
displacement (D), load (L), resistance (R) and time (t). It provides a
mathematically based definition of a subluxation. The subluxation is
defined as "a loss of positional integrity of the spine." The formula
representing the subluxation is D = L/R(t).
Conclusion: The mathematical formula used to describe the vertebral
subluxation is flexible enough to unify many apparently divergent
subluxation concepts, yet specific enough to allow quantitative as well
as qualitative analysis of spinal integrity
INDEX TERMS: MeSH: CHIROPRACTIC; BIOMECHANICS. OTHER: SUBLUXATION;
VERTEBRAL SUBLUXATION COMPLEX.
Chiropr J Aust 1996; 26:130-8.
Back to top
The Best of Books (and a Lemon) for 1996: A
Chiropractor's Reading List
PHILLIP EBRALL
Reviews are presented of a number of recently published books,
selectively sampled by the author as having relevance to the clinical
practice of chiropractic. The review comments are prefaced by
evidence-based commentary on aspects of the current general state of
chiropractic publishing. The conclusion is made that 1996 has been a
good publishing year for work of relevance and interest to the
chiropractic profession
INDEX TERMS: MeSH: CHIROPRACTIC; AUSTRALIA.
Chiropr J Aust 1996; 26:139-46
Back to top
|