CJA Vol.21 Issue 4
Spinal research laboratory at Griffith University:
an up-date.
Giles LG
Aboriginal spirituality and traditional
healing.
Burnum B
Chiropractic philosophy has no future.
Coulter ID
Chiropractic philosophy: is it relevant
today?
Cerutty MR
An institutional philosophy of
chiropractic.
Coulter ID
An institutional perspective on chiropractic
philosophy.
Bonello RP
An institutional perspective of philosophy in the
chiropractic curriculum.
Kleynhans AM
Sociology and philosophy of chiropractic.
Coulter ID
Chiropractic philosophy versus a philosophy in
chiropractic: the sociological implications of differing
perspectives.
Jamison JR
Developing philosophy in chiropractic.
Kleynhans AM
Looking to the future: from chiropractic philosophy
to the philosophy of chiropractic.
Jamison JR
A pox on all your houses
Charlton KH
A quest for better questions.
Chance MA ; Peters RE
ABSTRACTS
Spinal research laboratory at Griffith
University: an up-date.
Giles LG
Funding for laboratory staff salaries at the Spinal Research
Laboratory at Griffith University ceased on 5 February 1992. Despite
widespread support the laboratory failed due to a number of factors (i)
the long lead time between establishment of research and publication;
(ii) the lack of a perpetual grant; and (iii) the encroachment of
politics on research objectives. Chiropractic J Aust 1991
Dec;21(4):122
Back to top
Aboriginal spirituality and traditional
healing.
Burnum B
Concepts of health and disease vary widely among cultures and eras,
yet there are common themes. This paper outlines the basis for some of
the beliefs and practices associated with spiritual aspects of healing
traditions of the Aboriginal people of Australia, and includes
descriptions of typical incidents by way of illustration. Differences
between Aboriginal and Western notions of disease causation and the
meaning of illness are discussed. Selection, training, role and powers
of traditional healers, and division of responsibility by gender, are
briefly described. The practice of sorcery is introduced to illustrate
its relationship to healing beliefs and practices as "the other side of
the coin." Other traditional practices which in Western society are
associated with the health care system (eg midwifery, treatment of
wounds and fractures, and an extensive pharmacopoeia) are not addressed
in this paper, because they deal with ailments and situations which
responded to well-established procedures and therefore did not require a
search for an ultimate cause. Chiropractic J Aust 1991
Dec;21(4):123-8
Back to top
Chiropractic philosophy has no
future.
Coulter ID
The following paper argues that chiropractic philosophy is a misnomer
and that what chiropractors have described as chiropractic philosophy is
neither unique to chiropractic, nor, for the most part, is it
philosophy. However, it suggests that a viable philosophy of
chiropractic is not only possible, but desirable. It would help
chiropractors to resolve many of the present philosophical differences
so that at least their disagreements would be over something real to
disagree about and not simply political and rhetoric differences. A
philosophy of chiropractic would involve applying the fields and
insights of general philosophy to chiropractic issues. It would require
that chiropractors become more sophisticated about philosophy to
chiropractic issues. It would require that chiropractors become more
sophisticated about philosophy and, in particular, about conceptual
analysis. A major contribution of a philosophy of chiropractic would be
the clarification of chiropractic concepts. It would also allow the
metaphysical elements to enter the realm of rational discourse and leave
the worlds of dogma and doctrine where they have haunted the profession
for so long.
Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):129-31
Back to top
Chiropractic philosophy: is it relevant
today?
Cerutty MR
This paper attempts to draw together threads of the latest
developments in viewing the functions of the central nervous system; the
findings of quantum mechanics and particle physics, and their
experimental results which point strongly towards the conclusion that
chiropractic philosophy is more relevant today than ever. (abstract)
Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):132-5
Back to top
An institutional philosophy of
chiropractic.
Coulter ID
The following article examines the difficulty of establishing a
philosophy of chiropractic for a college that has enough consistency,
coherence and integration throughout the curriculum to constitute a body
of knowledge. It proposes a consensus model for developing such a
paradigm based on faculty debate and input. The report then examines two
attempts to achieve this at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
and the Los Angeles College of Chiropractic. From this work the major
traditional tenets of chiropractic have been identified. This consists
of at least five distinct philosophies: vitalism, holism, naturalism,
conservatism and critical rationalism. From these is derived a distinct
chiropractic paradigm of health and health care. The paper then examines
the implications of these for a curriculum.
Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):136-41
Back to top
An institutional perspective on chiropractic
philosophy.
Bonello RP.
In deference to a classic study of philosophy, this paper reviews
philosophy from a number of alternate perspectives more appropriate to
the needs of the chiropractic profession. The role of philosophy in
chiropractic theory and practice is highlighted in this way. It is
argued that there is a concrete need for the theoretical models
developed and adopted by the profession over the last ninety-six years.
The defacto use of formal education as a process of socialisation is
noted with its implications on chiropractic education. Finally, this
paper outlines the teaching of chiropractic principles and philosophy in
a university setting. Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):142-3
Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):142-3
Back to top
An institutional perspective of philosophy in
the chiropractic curriculum.
Kleynhans AM
A chiropractic institution's perspective of philosophy is reflected
in its curriculum. Philosophy impacts on the curriculum in two major
ways - as a foundation to the thinking of the curriculum developers and
as actual content. The philosophical foundation involves ontology,
epistemology and axiology, including ethics and aesthetics. Curriculum
content is determined through a situational analysis of external factors
(cultural and social changes; educational system requirements; changing
nature of content; lecturer support systems; and resources) and internal
institutional factors (student and staff characteristics; institutional
ethos; material resources; and perceived problems). Reasons are given
for inclusion in the curriculum of an introduction to philosophy with
emphasis on aspects such as philosophy of science and biology, logic
epistemology, etc.
Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):144-8
Back to top
Sociology and philosophy of
chiropractic.
Coulter ID
The following article uses the work of the author over the past ten
years to examine the way in which philosophy and philosophical concepts
enter into the sociological analysis of chiropractic. The paper examines
work in four key areas: the chiropractic paradigm; the chiropractic
wars; chiropractic education; and the chiropractic role. In each
instance, the fields of philosophy were utilised to solve substantive
problems. The paper suggests that chiropractic will require a greater
immersion into the general concepts and methodologies of philosophy if
it is ever to resolve some of the major issues that have split the
profession.
Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):149-52
Back to top
Chiropractic philosophy versus a philosophy
in chiropractic: the sociological implications of differing
perspectives.
Jamison JR
The sociological impact of chiropractic philosophy on chiropractic
practice within the health care system is evaluated, and the potential
impact of a philosophy of science in chiropractic practice is
postulated. It is proposed that implementation of the philosophy of
chiropractic as proposed by Watkins could facilitate acceptance of
chiropractic in health delivery system without compromising the quality
of chiropractic care.
Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):153-60
Back to top
Developing philosophy in
chiropractic.
Kleynhans AM
The development of philosophy in chiropractic is explored against the
background of increasing emphasis on philosophical issues in major
health disciplines, humanistic models and experiential aspects of
doctor-patient interaction, and disappearance of chiropractic philosophy
which is replete with dogma and antiquated notions. Conditions to be met
and the aspects and methods of philosophy required for the development
of a philosophy of chiropractic or, more realistically, philosophy in
chiropractic, are briefly outlined, including epistemology, logic,
hermeneutics, phenomenology, ethnography, grounded theory, etc.
Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):161-7
Back to top
Looking to the future: from chiropractic
philosophy to the philosophy of chiropractic.
Jamison JR
There is no future for a dogmatic fundamentalist form of chiropractic
philosophy within contemporary health care. There is enormous scope for
the implementation of a philosophy of science of chiropractic in health
care delivery. This paper provides a framework whereby practitioners may
actively participate in and contribute to the evolution of the
philosophy of chiropractic at the patient-practitioner interface.
Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):168-75
Back to top
A pox on all your houses.
Charlton KH
The author argues that much of the debate on chiropractic and
philosophy is high-handed and pompous. He calls for chiropractors to
forget the esoteric debates and really learn who they are. Then the
profession can set directions for practice, education and research. Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):176-8
Back to top
A quest for better questions.
Chance MA; Peters RE
DD Palmer, as the discoverer of chiropractic, was the first to
develop a chiropractic technique and rationale (later called
chiropractic philosophy) and was the first chiropractic instructor. He
personally taught the first fifteen students (the "15 disciples") and
presented them with a diploma stating that they were qualified to teach
and practise chiropractic. A brief sketch of some of them is presented.
A change in emphasis and a tendency to disavow chiropractic philosophy
which can be traced to certain of these early chiropractors created a
schism between purists and broad-spectrum practitioners which still
persists. To gain a glimpse of future directions in chiropractic
philosophy and the effect this might have on the practice of
chiropractic, we canvassed a sample of chiropractic opinion-makers.
Their statements are briefly discussed and provide a background for our
projections.
Chiropractic J Aust 1991 Dec;21(4):179-85
Back to top
|